+Congratulations
+This is the default homepage for your Tiki. If you are seeing this page, your installation was successful.
+
+
+You can change this page after logging in. Please review the wiki syntax for editing details.
+
+
+
+Get started.
+To begin configuring your site:
+
+
Log in with your newly created password.
Manually Enable specific Tiki features.
Run Tiki Profiles to quickly get up and running.
+
+Need help?
+For more information:
+
+
+Get help, including the official documentation and support forums.
+Join the Tiki community.
+]]>
+ <p>I have completely redone my pictures, and moved them to their own site on ZenFolio.
- <ul><li><a class="wiki external" target="_blank" href="https://plus.google.com/photos/108043634225161239251/albums/5695785163989645153" rel="external">babies-public-up-to-six-months</a><span class="icon icon-link-external fas fa-external-link-alt " ></span>,forto6monthsoldpictures</li><li><a class="wiki external" target="_blank" href="https://plus.google.com/photos/108043634225161239251/albums/5773109960423439425" rel="external">babies-public-six-to-twelve-months</a><span class="icon icon-link-external fas fa-external-link-alt " ></span>,for6 monthstoayearold pictures</li><li> <a class="wikiexternal"target="_blank"href="https://plus.google.com/photos/108043634225161239251/albums/5891466984894676225"rel="external">babies-public-12-to-18-months</a><spanclass="iconicon-link-externalfasfa-external-link-alt"></span></li><li><aclass="wikiexternal"target="_blank" href="https://plus.google.com/photos/108043634225161239251/albums/5885746610542247025"rel="external">babies-public-18-to-24-months</a><spanclass="iconicon-link-externalfas fa-external-link-alt " ></span></li></ul>
+ <p><a class="wiki external" target="_blank" href="http://rlpowell.zenfolio.com/" rel="external">Twin Picture Site</a><span class="icon icon-link-external fas fa-external-link-alt " ></span></p><p>Where everything is should be pretty obvious, but I want to specifically point out:</p><p><a class="wiki external" target="_blank" href="http://rlpowell.zenfolio.com/p204107290" rel="external">The Ordered By Modification Date Picture Group</a><span class="icon icon-link-external fas fa-external-link-alt " ></span></p><p>Any recently uploaded or altered picture will be at the top of that list, so that's the one that you want if you want to see what's changed. It also has an RSS feed.</p>]]>
+
+ <p>3. This one is not paraphrased: "It makes the entirely credible assumption that candidates with identical credentials will have identical qualifications (more precisely, that gender is not predictive of the relative qualifications of two candidates with identical credentials). I think that's the proper default assumption, and someone who wishes to challenge it should have the burden of proving that it's incorrect.". Well, I can't speak to physics, but in my field, I've not observed that assumption to hold. I bow out of running the study in question; scientific studies are not, in any respect, my field. I would be *more* than happy to throw money at someone who *is* studying this, though.</p><p>ADDENDUM:</p><p>A friend pointed me to <a class="wiki external" target="_blank" href="http://www.bitkom.org/files/documents/BITKOM_Presseinfo_Sprachkenntnisse_25_09_2012.pdf" rel="external">a German survey</a><span class="icon icon-link-external fas fa-external-link-alt " ></span>, in which 46% of German women from 14-29 years old claimed to know at least one programming language. Even if it's crap in terms of actual competence (i.e. "can you pass fizzbuzz?"), that *claim* is so starkly different from what I'd expect to see in the US that it gives me real hope that at least *some* of the problem is both social and solvable. I'm smiling right now as I type this, in fact.]]>
+ <p>This post talks about concepts that are <a class="wiki external" target="_blank" href="http://lesswrong.com/lw/kg/expecting_short_inferential_distances/" rel="external">many, many inferential steps away from what you are used to</a><span class="icon icon-link-external fas fa-external-link-alt " ></span>. You need to read <a class="wiki external" target="_blank" href="http://lesswrong.com/lw/kg/expecting_short_inferential_distances/" rel="external">this post</a><span class="icon icon-link-external fas fa-external-link-alt " ></span> by Eliezer Yudkowsky, not for background, but to understand that some things that are true really <em>do</em> have complicated backgrounds and need a lot of explanation leading up to them. The human brain is built to treat all complicated explanations as crazy talk, and you need to read that to understand why, and resist it when reading the rest of this post.
- <p>I try very hard here to make sure that I start only from things thata decently well-educated layperson already knows, and please do feelfree to <a class="wiki" href="mailto:rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org" rel="">point it out to me</a>should I fail in that regard. But it's going to take more than onestep, and I can't fix that. Please try not to assume I'm crazy<em>only</em> because the explanation is complicated.
+ <p>I try very hard here to make sure that I start only from things that a decently well-educated layperson already knows, and please do feel free to <a class="wiki" href="mailto:rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org" rel="">point it out to me</a> should I fail in that regard. But it's going to take more than one step, and I can't fix that. Please try not to assume I'm crazy <em>only</em> because the explanation is complicated.
-Summary / Recap
-That Noise Is A Paradigm Shifting Without A Clutch
-Why I'm Sure The Singularity Is Coming
-Why Intelligence Matters
-The Limits Of Physical Technology
-The Downside Of MNT
-Imperatives And Morality
-This Parrot Will Foom, Even Without 4 Million Volts
-Why Increased Computing Power Is Scary
-Being A Singularitarian: Picking The Best Horse
-I Still Have Savings: Why This Isn't A Cult Or A Religion
-How I Could Be Wrong
-An End To All Ills
-Timeline
-]]>WARNING, or, How To Read This Post
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- <p>Basically, science is a bunch of people looking for weird or interesting things and then turning to each other and saying, "Did you see that!?". Which pretty much everybody does,the difference is that scientists (<a class="wiki external" target="_blank" href="http://yudkowsky.net/rational/virtues" rel="external">in theory anyways</a><span class="icon icon-link-external fas fa-external-link-alt " ></span>) take everyone else saying "No" as evidence that what they saw doesn't actually exist, rather than as a reason to <a class="wiki external" target="_blank" href="http://lesswrong.com/lw/gw/politics_is_the_mindkiller/" rel="external">argue as though we were sitting around the primordial campfire and our futures depended on it</a><span class="icon icon-link-external fas fa-external-link-alt " ></span>, which is what the human default is.
+ <p>Basically, science is a bunch of people looking for weird or interesting things and then turning to each other and saying, "Did you see that!?". Which pretty much everybody does; the difference is that scientists (<a class="wiki external" target="_blank" href="http://yudkowsky.net/rational/virtues" rel="external">in theory anyways</a><span class="icon icon-link-external fas fa-external-link-alt " ></span>) take everyone else saying "No" as evidence that what they saw doesn't actually exist, rather than as a reason to <a class="wiki external" target="_blank" href="http://lesswrong.com/lw/gw/politics_is_the_mindkiller/" rel="external">argue as though we were sitting around the primordial campfire and our futures depended on it</a><span class="icon icon-link-external fas fa-external-link-alt " ></span>, which is what the human default is.]]>
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
+
+
+EMail Changes
+
+EMail is delivered on stodi, and is delivered now to a
+ maildir folder named
+ ~/Maildir . This shouldn't effect much of anything except that
+ you'll have to modify your mail program's setup to point there. In
+ the event that you have trouble making that work, let me know.]]>
+
+As a side comment, and partly so that people don't get the
+ impression that I'm all like "DRUGS ARE AWESOME!" or something,
+ here's how I scared my nephews about hard drugs when the topic came
+ up. First of all, stop saying "drugs" like all drugs (including the
+ ones in your medicine cabinet) are of the same category, and start
+ talking about particular chemicals (don't know enough? that's part
+ of the test). My basic technique is to explain that if you try meth
+ or coke or heroin, in particular but there are others, the odds are
+ that you will immediately and irrevocably die. Not physically;
+ you'll still be walking around and talking to people. But the
+ person that I value in you will be gone forever, replaced by someone
+ who shares all your memories but has only one motivation: to get
+ more meth or coke or heroin. I do not want you to be a heroin
+ zombie, and I don't think you do either, so don't try it, because
+ the odds of that happening are way too high to be ignored.
+
+
+I've found that if I explain that in sufficient detail of what I
+ mean by "heroin zombie" and how totally dead they will truly be as a
+ person, this scares them sufficiently for my purposes.
+
+
+]]>Moving on, back to talking to kids about risks in general.
+ </li><li> <a href="tiki-index.php?page=Rules+For+My+Servers" title="Rules For My Servers" class="wiki wiki_page">Rules For My Servers</a></li></ul>]]>